“Older Person” toilet jokes crosses the line Planning Board…Now what???

STINKS (Copy) At the April Planning Board meeting during a discussion about expanding the “Older Person” housing ordinance a joke was made about the bathroom habits of the elderly.

The reaction of the board members is quite disturbing:

So sad to see a Selectman and Planing Board members laughing so hardheartedly at this form of base humor.

What say you voting public?

“There are things public officials would never do if they thought somebody might call them out on it.”

OHB…keeping it real… making it easier for you to find the facts so you can draw your own conclusions…..

http://www.onlyhennikerbruce.comwater users

 

 

 

 

Planning Board Chair Dean Tirrell keeps everyone in the dark…Fails to use tax payer supported web page to inform public…Select Women Hooper fails to advise board of their duty to inform????

A HENNIKER PLANNING BOARD (Copy) Henniker has acquiesced to calls for transparency and has finally begun posting some supporting documents for the Board of Selectmen meetings

One would think that Select Women Hooper would take this initiative over to the Planning Board, where she is the BOS representative, and advocate for the planning Board to do the same.

Apparently not! (agenda)

It would appear that the concept of transparency and participation is not embraced by the Planning Board’s new chairman, Mr. Dean Tirrell.

The June 14, 2017 agenda had a few noteworthy items. I would think that the 202/127 intersection information would be worth repeating at any opportunity.

And, I wonder what Zoning Changes they were talking about last night? As we all have found out…zoning ordinance and planning board policy compliance is not exactly being asked of everyone.

Colby Hill Inn for example. Expansion and creation of their Bar Barn has fail to comply with town policy…and no one seems to care.

If Colby Hill Inn is considered a non-conforming commercial use then any expansion or alteration of their property must go before the Zoning Board for review:

Zoning Regulations; 133-72 Non-conforming Uses Alterations: Alteration, expansion or change of a     non-conforming use or structure shall only be permitted by Special Exception by the Zoning Board of Adjustment if it finds that….

 

If compliant the Colby Hill Inn is required to go before the Planning Board for Site Plan review:

Planning Board Chapter 203; 203-3 Applicability
A.General- Subject to the exceptions stated below, these regulations apply to any of the
following actions, regardless of whether the action includes a subdivision or re-subdivision of the site:
1.Any new commercial,industrial, multi-family development of land (including,
but not limited to, the construction of any building, any addition to a building, any
other structure, or parking areas).
2.Any Change of Land Use, as described below.
3.Any expansion of the physical size of an existing non-residential land use.
B.Definition-A “Change of Land Use” occurs when there is a change in the quality,
character, or intensity of the use of a building or site, such that there is likely
to be a noticeable impact on the neighborhood or the town. A Change of Land Use may occur even though the general classification of use remains the same and even if the proposed change does not involve construction. A Change of Land Use is determined from the most recent use to the proposed use.
The standards of review listed in Article V of these regulations also indicate the kinds of impacts that would be considered in determining whether a Change of Land Use would occur.
OHB is amazed at how our board members just fail recognize they have a duty to follow procedures that will insure public awareness. Why  is that Mr. Tirrell??? Ms. Hooper???

“There are things public officials would never do if they thought somebody might call them out on it.”

OHB…keeping it real… making it easier for you to find the facts so you can draw your own conclusions…..

http://www.onlyhennikerbruce.comwater users

WATER USERS…your next bill will be ($$$/gallon yet unknown and not posted) determined by the electronic water meters!

COST OF GOVERNMENT (Copy) Approximately five weeks from now the residents who have town water will be getting their first water bills determined by the electronic water meters.

Review of the posted minutes reveals that the $$$/gallon is yet unknown to the public. (read here)

What we do know from those minutes is this, “Chief Operator Bumford has been running different formulas for billing purposes.” (page 2) Whatever that means?????

We respectfully request that the town post the $$$/gallon rates as soon as possible.

Good luck everyone!

 

“There are things public officials would never do if they thought somebody might call them out on it.”

OHB…keeping it real… making it easier for you to find the facts so you can draw your own conclusions…..

http://www.onlyhennikerbruce.comwater users

 

 

 

 

$1.5 billion generated by agriculture in NH, $336 M direct sales of agriculture products… a whopping $1.2 Billion attributed to AGRITOURISM…

FARMERS The economic impact trend numbers are pretty clear, Open Space Recreation on NH Farms grew over 300% from 1996 to 2012.

January 1999, the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests published a study detailing the impact Open Space has on NH’s economy.

Agriculture [see Executive Summary table page 1]: Direct income from farm related products in 1996 were $413 M. Direct and Indirect income attributed to Open Space was $377 M.

By 2012, just 5 short years [2007] after the first Agritourism amendment to RSA 21:34 A (read here),  Direct and Indirect income from Open Space Agritourism events  grew by almost 300%, to $1.2 BILLION! (read here)

During that period farms direct sale of farm products dropped slightly to $366 M.

Clearly OPEN SPACE RECREATIONAL Activities play and important role in NH’s overall economy. There should be no doubt that the revenue streams from Agritourism are vital  to our farmer’s survival.

After all…would you want open space or cluster bunched housing???

Does Henniker want  to bring people into Henniker to spend their money and be a player in a $1.2 Billion industry…or not?

By contrast, a Plymouth State study shows that direct and indirect spending by snow mobile activities in 2012 brought in $298 M and independent studies show OHRV-ATV direct and indirect income around $128 M.

We need to wake up and stop destroying ourselves!

 

“There are things public officials would never do if they thought somebody might call them out on it.”

OHB…keeping it real… making it easier for you to find the facts so you can draw your own conclusions…..

http://www.onlyhennikerbruce.com

 

 

 

 

Spencer Bennett tattle tails to town…Steve Forster just trying to have an “occasional gathering of people who are well known and share a warm regard for one another”…and his awful neighbor stalks and takes photos!

lousy neighbors Do you want to live in a town where government officials tell you who can come and enjoy your property?

That is exactly what Town Administrator Trovato wrote to Mr. Forster in a letter dated September 1, 2015. Letter from town of Henniker

Today, May 27, 2017 Mr. Forster is doing just what the town told him he could do, have an occasional gathering of family and persons who are well known and share a warm regard for one another and Spencer Bennett sends a letter to the BOS, Planning Board, ZBA, Town Administrator and town attorney alerting all of them that he wasn’t invited to the gathering of family and he is not a person whom anyone shares a warm regard for!

Tough luck Spencer…NO PARTY FOR YOU!

SO BUZZ OFF PAL!!!

This town has some real problems!

OHB…keeping it real… making it easier for you to find the facts so you can draw your own conclusions…..

http://www.onlyhennikerbruce.com

 

OHB’s phone rings off hook…Cordell Johnston Lectures NH Library Trustees Association on Right-to Know…tells how Henniker’s Planning Board improperly used non-public sessions…

phone-ringing Hat tip to Henniker resident and lawyer extraordinaire Cordell Johnston who gave a wonderful talk to the NH Library Trustees Association on Tuesday May, 23, 2017. Within minutes of the completion of his talk OHB’s office phone began ringing off the hook.

You see there were about 15 bloggers in the room analyzing everything Mr. Johnston had to say.

Mr. Johnston gave the Trustees sound legal advice on Right-to-Know and how to run proper meetings.

He told the story how 20 years ago as a corporate lawyer,  when he first joined Henniker’s Planning Board, the board would  go into a non public session whenever it wanted to discuss things they didn’t want everyone in town to know about. Clearly an improper use of a non-public session.

OHB contacted Mr. Johnston by phone, he told me how he went to an Office of Energy and Planning (OEP) training session, realized right away that the town was improperly using the non-public sessions and promptly set the town straight.

Thanks Cordell!

However, OHB has clearly shown that the town officials has failed to keep up with the times and continues to violate the law regarding the use of emails, text messages and the use of private cell phones…all things that were of little concern back in 1997.

Cordell, OHB challenges you to give your 1 hours talk to the current Henniker officials and all of us in the public. I PERSONALLY WILL PAY YOU FOR YOUR 1 HOUR OF TIME!

Clearly  this town needs your help!

 

OHB…keeping it real… making it easier for you to find the facts so you can draw your own conclusions…..

http://www.onlyhennikerbruce.com

 

Select Women Hooper blatantly misstates facts about Hillside Drive Variance…BOS oblivious to ZBA granting the variance in violation of RSA 674:33!

TRUTH (Copy) On May 16, 2017 the BOS was asked to review the decision of the Henniker ZBA in Case 2017-001; NOTICE OF DECISION ZBA 4-19-2017

In that decision Lot A-17 was granted a variance for road frontage from 105 feet to just 70.96 feet. A 30 foot reduction form the required 100 feet.

RSA 674:33 requires the following 5 criteria confirmed before granting a variance:

  • (1) The variance will not be contrary to the public interest;
  • (2) The spirit of the ordinance is observed;
  • (3) Substantial justice is done;
  • (4) The values of surrounding properties are not diminished;
  • (5) Literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would result in an unnecessary hardship. (A) For purposes of this subparagraph, “unnecessary hardship” means that, owing to special conditions of the property that distinguish it from other properties in the area: (i) No fair and substantial relationship exists between the general public purposes of the ordinance provision and the specific application of that provision to the property; and (ii) The proposed use is a reasonable one. (B) If the criteria in subparagraph (A) are not established, an unnecessary hardship will be deemed to exist if, and only if, owing to special conditions of the property that distinguish it from other properties in the area, the property cannot be reasonably used in strict conformance with the ordinance, and a variance is therefore necessary to enable a reasonable use of it.

#5 (A) requires that the subject property has a special condition that distinguishes the  property fro all other property in the area. This is the primary condition for Hardship to be established.

Hillside Drive’s applicants failed to establish that the property had any special conditions what so ever.

What was granted was not a variance but a total evisceration of the road frontage minimum requirement ordinance.

Now comes Select Board member Hooper who gives the following explanation of the application and decision:

She states four things that are contrary to the notice of decision linked above and rthe plat of subdivision recorded 39 years ago:

  1. No change in size of the parcels- INCORRECT: notice of decision calls for one property’s frontage to be reduced from 105 feet to 70.96 feet while the adjacent property gains 30 feet and goes from 120 feet to 155 feet of frontage.
  2. The parcels have been evenly divided- INCORRECT: see point #1
  3. To allow appropriate access- INCORRECT: as we have seen in a previous post this is an adverse possession-trespass problem. Access has noting to do with this application Hillside Drive trespass
  4. A lot of engineering has been done in Hillside Drive and sadly some of those property lines weren’t done as clean as they should have been-INCORRECT: property lines were platted and recorded in 1978 over 39 year years ago. Many mortgages have been issued on the subject properties and no legal authority has claimed that the lot lines were incorrect. HILLSIDE DRIVE RECORDED PLAN MAP Lot A-17 and A-18 page 2

The fact that the ZBA violated Henniker Zoning Chapter 133-69 went right by the entire BOS. (page 45 of 88)

There is no excuse for not knowing the facts (RSA and Town Ordinance) about issues brought to the BOS’ attention, especially when you Ms. Hooper choose to speak about it.

Once board members misstate facts…the board has lost all credibility and that is why this BOS is so dysfunctional.

The BOS is our last resort for the inappropriate actions taken by appointed committees.

WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT a BOS that is dysfunctional and cannot assure us that the process is not being corrupted?

It is unconscionable that the BOS refused to even examine and deliberate the facts of the unlawful awarding of a variance on Hillside Drive.

 

OHB…keeping it real… making it easier for you to find the facts so you can draw your own conclusions…..

http://www.onlyhennikerbruce.com